Page 2 of 3: businesses ranked 101-200 of 235. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Five-star reviewers praise punctuality and thorough work at fair prices. Recent one-star complaints describe a steep decline: incomplete cleaning, staff eating on duty, damaged property with unresolved claims, repeated cancellations, and dismissive admin responses. Long-term customers report paying more for lower quality.
Most bookings arrive on time with staff who ask for feedback after each task and clean thoroughly. The one critical review flagged slowness and incomplete work on sink and toilet areas, contrasting sharply with the overwhelming praise for attention to detail and fair value. Last-minute requests and office cleaning emerge as particular strengths. Flexibility on hours and cleaner count is standard. One reviewer appreciated the website's instant pricing calculator and WhatsApp contact option, while another needed emergency post-renovation cleaning completed within an extended booking.
Reviewers consistently return to a small group of named technicians-Icad, Naim, and Cad-who show up on time and work with visible care. Staff explain their process before and after, spot dirt in corners homeowners miss, and handle fabrics (sofas, mattresses, curtains) with attention to the finish. A few note the price is reasonable for the thoroughness delivered and the time spent on each job. Sofa and mattress cleaning dominate the feedback, with steaming and scent treatment mentioned. Some customers have used them for move-in cleans and applaud the responsiveness and willingness to tackle extra stains. The consistency of praise for the same individuals suggests the business succeeds through the skill and personality of its core team.
Most jobs run smoothly, with cleaners arriving on time and tackling stains, corners, and details that casual help might skip. Pricing sits well below typical rates for the work done. However, two recent reviews highlight serious lapses: staff arguing on a client's speakerphone, incomplete cleaning despite a full service, and a tone-deaf response when complaints surfaced. The business made the situation right with a refund, but the operational breaks and staff consistency remain a concern.
All 10 reviews award five stars. Reviewers consistently praise the team for delivering spotless results quickly, with friendly and experienced staff who go out of their way to help even on short notice. Weekly regular cleaning and one-off deep cleans both draw praise; an owner's personal site visit during a rush move-out job stands out as a sign of accountability.
Fast, no-fuss cleaning that gets the job done on time. Staff show up punctually, work without fussing around, and leave spaces noticeably cleaner in the areas that matter most. Many return bookings suggest the service fits busy households looking for weekly maintenance or one-off rescues between deeper cleans. Flexibility stands out: reviewers book everything from quick two-hour sessions to full deep cleans, and the team adapts without complaint. Several mention relief at being able to carry on with their day while work happens quietly. Upholstery cleaning also draws praise, with at least one sofa brought back from heavy dirt.
When the team shows up and has the right equipment, they deliver solid results: post-renovation jobs get two walkthroughs, staff stay attentive to details, and five-star reviewers feel well looked after. But half the one-star reviews cite no-shows or cancellations a day before, rushed work that leaves dust and missed corners, staff who forget basic tools (buckets, glass wipers) or use client belongings without permission, and management that dismisses complaints instead of fixing them. The business splits sharply: experienced crews like Rin earn praise for thoroughness, while inconsistent teams and operational failures undermine trust. Pricing runs RM120 for standard cleaning plus RM42 for materials; customers expect either skilled, complete work or a genuine resolution when things go wrong, and many feel they get neither.
Most users report fast, attentive cleaning from named staff like Usman, Fikri, and Emma. The app works smoothly and weekly rates sit at RM120 per session. A long-standing customer noted repeated booking cancellations and weak follow-up, while two office clients discovered the crew departed early with no prior notice that office work uses different hour-to-person calculations. Management responses to these disputes were reportedly curt and unhelpful. Maideasy shines with punctual female or male cleaners who focus on windows, bathrooms, and organisation without cutting corners. Yet the gap between residential and office handling, combined with a pattern of last-minute drops and defensive replies, suggests booking with clear terms beforehand is wise. Their Spring Cleaning package (RM902.88 for 3 cleaners over 5.5 hours) and same-day surcharge (+RM10) are transparent, but office work requires explicit upfront clarity.
The business draws strong praise for its recycling and sustainability work, with a standout team noted for dedication. However, customer-facing service quality varies significantly: some workers lack politeness and cleaning standards have fallen short at retail sites, with tables left unclean or smelly cloths used.
All 13 reviews are five-star. Customers praise speed, punctuality, and thorough results. Staff responsiveness and friendliness come up consistently across older reviews.
Two recent five-star reviews praise Clean.my for on-time arrival, friendly technicians, and completing work as agreed. Limited review evidence, but both customers report satisfied outcomes.
Most customers report thorough, quick cleaning that leaves homes looking new. Teams are friendly and professional, with pricing reviewers call fair and reasonable. One significant complaint: a cancellation at the last minute with no prior warning despite confirmation checks, which the reviewer felt showed poor accountability. For ongoing jobs, staff come back regularly and book easily. The owner responds quickly to enquiries, and most appointments go smoothly. That single no-show stood out as a major lapse in communication and professionalism.
Febulux wins consistent praise for courteous, attentive staff and meticulous work when things go well. Clients highlight named technicians like Karamjeet Kaur, Haseeb, and Sohail Ahmad as reliable and detail-focused, often completing deep cleans to high standards and responding flexibly to requests. Yet several recent accounts report severe failures: staff arriving unprepared, lacking basic cleaning competence, working slowly or distracted, and leaving homes dirtier than found. One customer paid RM1300 for post-renovation work but had to re-clean themselves; another reported a crew member asleep on the job. When problems arise, communication with management can feel dismissive rather than corrective.
Long-term clients consistently praise Shoolin for punctuality, thorough work, and reliable staff who show up when promised and clean every corner. The team responds to feedback, works efficiently together, and handles everything from regular home cleaning to deep jobs without fuss or surprises.
Half the reviews praise professional, organized work; the rest cite staff attitude problems and rough driving. Limited recent detail makes current service quality hard to assess.
All 10 Google reviews are five-star. Reviewers praise fast response times, friendly staff, and professional delivery of work. However, most feedback is brief, so detail on specific services is limited.
Job Enrich places trained, vetted maids into homes across Selangor and has kept customers for 8-20 years. Their staff conduct interviews and handle paperwork with care. One reviewer noted a manager named Encik Sharf followed up after placement.
Strong cleaners deliver meticulous work when they arrive on time, earning loyal repeat customers. The real issue is operational: staff frequently show up late or fail to appear entirely, calls go unanswered, and management does not respond to complaints. When things go right, the service is excellent; when scheduling falters, trust breaks down fast.
Most reviews highlight quick, friendly service and thorough work at fair prices. Booking is straightforward and staff arrive on time; Mr. Chin and individual cleaners like Azizah earn specific praise for attention to detail and politeness. A persistent issue is slow or midnight replies to daytime messages and occasional no-shows, which undercut the experience for first-time customers trying to book. Residential and deep-cleaning jobs dominate positive feedback, with reviewers noting dust removal after renovations and move-in cleans completed within stated hours. The business serves Petaling Jaya and nearby areas, operates 7 days, and their website claims certification and service since 2021. However, scattered reports of rude or inattentive staff suggest quality varies by cleaner assigned.
Most customers report on-time arrival, thorough work, and friendly staff; one recent complaint flags poor responsiveness to calls and messages. Limited recent review data means current performance is unclear.
Reviewers consistently praise Wan and Ifan for thorough, professional floor work that delivers striking visual results. Marble and polished floors look noticeably better after service, with clients reporting easy communication and strong follow-up.
Most clients praise ASM for speed and thoroughness, completing jobs quickly while paying attention to detail. The team responds promptly to requests and works flexibly to meet what customers need, with reasonable pricing noted by several reviewers.
For years, Big Family Cleaning earned trust for thorough, detail-oriented work that left homes spotless. Staff were punctual, polite, and attentive to overlooked corners and window tracks. Recently, however, service has deteriorated sharply: chronic lateness (averaging 35 minutes, sometimes over an hour), incomplete cleaning that customers must redo, staff resistance to redoing missed sections, and property damage with deflection rather than accountability. One long-term customer after two years stopped using them due to the accumulation. Customer service responses remain corporate and unresponsive to documented problems. The business claims 20+ years in operation and serves the Klang Valley. Newer five-star reviews (recent months) still describe excellent thorough work, suggesting inconsistency across technicians or a recent operational decline affecting some clients. Payment billing disputes and false upcharges have also been reported, compounding trust issues.
Five-star reviews across three years show consistent praise for floor polishing and carpet cleaning that leaves surfaces gleaming. Staff respond quickly, work neatly, and charge fairly. Reviewers report sofas, mattresses, terrazzo, marble, and porcelain tiles restored to near-new condition.
Most jobs deliver spotless results with courteous staff, but one recent account reported rushed work, missed replacements, and unresponsive customer support. Post-renovation deep cleans drew consistent praise for thoroughness; household cleans show mixed results depending on the team assigned.
MK Cleaning Services has earned a 4.9-star rating from 9 reviews with 89% five-star scores. Limited review detail means specific service insights are scarce, but the consistent high ratings suggest customers experience reliable, professional work across residential and commercial jobs.
Most customers report punctual, thorough cleaning with attentive staff and fast booking. However, a recent client discovered the team lacks post-renovation expertise: stains they claimed were permanent were removed by a specialized competitor, and at RM1,500 per day, the reviewer felt the value was poor for general work. Verri Clean excels at post-tenant cleanouts, office deep cleans, and sofa upholstery work, with multiple five-star reviews from commercial projects (Petronas, SKA Miri). Staff arrive prepared and finish on time. The caveat: they are a general cleaning company that markets post-renovation services without the specialist tools or chemical knowledge that distinction requires.
Most customers praise Sapphire Homes for on-time arrival, thorough work, and fair rates. Staff are described as motivated and communicative. One long-standing customer had a serious dispute over scheduling and reported unprofessional handling by management, raising concerns about how complaints are managed.
All six Google reviews rate Mr Problem at five stars. Reviewers consistently praise punctual arrival, professional cleaning quality, and friendly staff. The business handles post-renovation deep cleans, mattress cleaning with specialist equipment, and air conditioning services; pricing starts from RM90 for basic work to RM360 for deep cleans.
Eight consecutive five-star reviews highlight staff consistency and reliability. Customers return for repeat bookings, praising how the same cleaner learns their home and habits. Speed, attention to detail, and flexible last-minute scheduling round out the experience. One reviewer noted "reasonable price" and another called the team "invaluable" for a high-traffic academy setting.
All four reviews rate the service five stars. Customers highlight fast, reliable work and staff who complete jobs with care and attention. The team arrives on time and leaves spaces noticeably fresh.
Airosteam earns 4.8 stars on 61 reviews, with 87% five-star ratings. Most clients praise thorough post-renovation and deep cleaning, naming supervisors Haniff and Yasser for diligent work. A 2022 complaint about unresponsive admin appears outdated; recent feedback highlights team punctuality and care with valuables, though one customer noted wet flooring after cleaning.
Most users praise punctual, detail-focused cleaning that leaves homes and offices visibly clean without needing supervision. However, a serious allegation of theft involving a diamond ring, combined with what the reviewer describes as staged video evidence and lack of accountability, significantly undermines trust despite the company's clean-up efforts and eventual ring return. The business handles routine residential and office jobs well, with named staff like Sean and Leka earning repeat bookings. Air conditioning service also appears reliable. The theft incident and how it was managed remain a critical concern for security-conscious clients.
Most jobs finish well: reviewers praise speed, cleanliness, fair prices, and the crew's professionalism. One contract customer faced serious delays when staff didn't show and management wouldn't answer or send replacements. For one-off cleaning, confidence is high; longer-term arrangements carry more risk.
Experiences here split sharply. When this service delivers, customers praise punctual arrival, staff who listen, and attention to corners others miss. Pricing feels fair to repeat customers. Yet a substantial group encountered rushed work, untrained teams who missed spots despite being asked to return, and frustrating pre-service communication gaps. One customer waited 30 minutes past appointment time and was later pressured to pay roadside; another was charged for hours beyond what was quoted. Post-renovation jobs drew particular criticism for not meeting the "move-in ready" standard promised. The team sometimes rewills window glass or stays late to finish, which counts. But inconsistency runs deep: some crews arrive prepared and organised, others show up without basic ladders. Booking feels like a gamble on which crew shows up. Their website claims 15 years' experience and 18 qualifications, yet multiple reviewers flagged untrained workers and workers who don't understand what "deep cleaning" means.
Four recent reviews offer limited texture. Two rate the service highly without detail; one calls it remarkable. One office client complains the cleaner undoes tied trash bags to hand-collect waste rather than removing full bins, a practice that disrupts their workflow.
All nine reviews are five-star. Customers praise fast, patient service and detailed work on mattresses, sofas, and curtains using steam and vacuum methods. Pricing draws repeated approval, and the local team's professionalism has prompted referrals.
Most recent reviews praise thorough work and reliable staff. One older complaint about unresponsive customer service and app problems; limited recent detail on booking or communication.
All eight reviews are five-star. Customers praise Woopsie for removing stubborn stains, arriving on time, and explaining the process before starting. Prices start from RM50 for curtains, RM70 for sofas, and RM100 for mattresses and carpet. Reviewers mention sofa, mattress, and upholstery work across Klang Valley suburbs.
Most users report smooth bookings, professional cleaners, and transparent pricing with no surprises. One reviewer noted a discrepancy between what was agreed and what arrived (extra cleaners without warning), though they praised the actual cleaners. The business consistently delivers on time and responds quickly to requests.
Most visits result in spotless homes completed on time by efficient, detail-focused teams who go beyond standard cleaning-washing windows from outside, vacuuming curtains, cleaning inside wardrobes and machines. One severe incident involving alleged theft of jewelry by a cleaner, with the company refusing accountability weeks later, stands as a serious trust breach that undermines otherwise strong technical performance across the majority of jobs. The bosses Jin and Chriz are named as friendly and responsive; fair pricing and fair pricing are repeatedly noted; post-renovation work is specifically praised. However, the single 1-star review documents a troubling pattern: slow work, items moved to random places, staff requiring constant direction, and most critically, missing jewelry that the company declined to investigate or compensate.
All five reviews rate S&S Creatives Ventures at five stars, citing on-time arrival, politeness, and quality cleaning work. Review volume is limited and all feedback dates back three years.
Strong turnaround and care with special garments draw regular customers, but missing items and material damage-along with pushback when problems occur-are serious enough to deter those handling valuables or worried about accountability.
Most recent bookings arrive on time with their own supplies and get reliable weekly or one-time cleans. Reviewers praise cleaners like Rina, Ika, and Selvia for attention to detail and care with delicate items. However, older complaints flagged slow management responses after damage, late arrivals on confirmed bookings, deep cleans done poorly with minimal equipment and training, and a serious payment processing incident. Their strongest reviews span three years of satisfied regulars; worst issues cluster around 1-2 years ago.
Customers report consistently strong results across office post-renovation and deep cleans. Work is detailed and thorough, with staff willing to go beyond the scope (paint scraping, corner finishing) without extra charge to restore neglected spaces.
Most jobs run smoothly with staff arriving on time and cleaning thoroughly, though one cancellation threw a day off schedule. Named cleaners like Anna, Za, and Shrifah earn praise for detail work; Mr. Chin, listed as the person in charge, handles complaints quickly. A few note the cost edges toward expensive for partial-room jobs. Reviewers trust them for residential work after repeat bookings spanning years. The service reaches Petaling Jaya, Selangor, and KL. One scheduling slip undercuts an otherwise solid track record; the business appears to train staff well but sometimes struggles with punctuality promises.
All four reviews rate Thunder Shine five stars. Reviewers praise punctual arrival, efficient work, and detailed cleaning; booking was smooth with staff described as friendly and professional.
Most bookings deliver spotless homes with diligent, friendly crews who arrive on time and work fast. Deep cleaning packages draw consistent praise for thoroughness. However, two serious incidents cast doubt: one customer reported missing jewellery and money during service with subsequent calls ignored; another reported missed appointments and poor response times. Trust and accountability issues undermine the otherwise strong technical work. Staff turnover or vetting gaps may explain the range. When service goes well, customers return and recommend. When things go wrong, resolution appears absent.
Most customers find Kilat Kilat dependable and affordable, praising staff responsiveness and tidy results. Deva and Nita are named for professionalism. However, some deep-clean bookings fell short of expectations, with reviewers reporting inadequate high dusting and weak mopping despite paying for premium services. The business claims to operate since 2009 across Petaling Jaya and Klang Valley, offering house, office, and post-renovation cleaning. Their strength lies in routine housekeeping and responsive WhatsApp communication. Gaps emerge when customer complaints arise, with one reviewer stating the company ignored feedback entirely.
Experience here hinges on which team shows up. Long-term clients praise speed and consistency, but recent reviews paint a sharply different picture: missed appointments without notice, rushed jobs leaving dust and dirt behind, staff using same cloth across surfaces, and a customer service team that ignores follow-up requests for receipts and hangs up on callers. One five-star client used them for two years; another stopped after one visit when a gold chain went missing and no investigation followed.
Five-star average across 44 reviews shows consistent satisfaction. Customers return year after year for sofa, carpet, and mattress cleaning, praising fast turnaround, friendly staff, and stain removal that restores furniture appearance. Pricing at RM25/hour for general cleaning and reasonable rates for specialised services keeps them competitive. One named technician, Mr Len, appears frequently in older reviews.
Rakan Ikhlas Services scores well on reliability across residential and office cleaning, with most reviews praising the standard of work. Detail on specific services or pricing is limited in available reviews.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
All 13 reviews are five-star. Reviewers consistently praise fast response times, thorough cleaning work, and friendly staff. One customer noted mattress cleaning resolved dust allergies and sleep issues. Pricing is described as competitive, with customers often highlighting good value for the work done and willingness to rebook.
Seven reviews averaged 4.3 stars, with 71% five-star ratings. Review text is unavailable, so detail is limited. The business states it has operated since 2014 and serves Selangor with residential, commercial, and post-construction cleaning.
Reviewers praise Sirius for meticulous post-renovation cleaning, especially windows and glass work. Mr. Rajiv and his team deliver thorough, efficient service with strong attention to detail. Communication is reliable despite occasional delays.
Every review is five-star, with customers repeatedly praising Mr. Jay's quick responses and willingness to explain pricing honestly. Teams are punctual, thorough, and often go beyond what's expected. The business builds lasting relationships by assigning the same maid to regular clients, eliminating the need to retrain someone each visit.
Review evidence is limited: three five-star ratings over several years support basic competence, but detail on what reviewers experienced is sparse. The business claims over 25 years operating and MACC membership, though residential cleaning feedback remains thin.
All three reviews are five-star ratings, though detail is limited. The business operates across Kuala Lumpur and beyond, offering commercial cleaning, carpet work, and post-renovation services.
All ten reviews on Google award five stars. Customers describe the team as professional and respectful, with no reported complaints across the sample period.
Most five-star reviews credit the team's punctuality, thorough work, and ability to handle last-minute requests. Staff bring their own supplies and handle extra tasks without fuss. However, recent one-star reviews report a no-show with no explanation and frustrating back-and-forth with different staff members who failed to answer basic questions, suggesting operational issues despite strong cleaning delivery.
Quality hinges on who shows up. Early clients and long-term users praise polite, efficient cleaners who finish thoroughly. Later reviews reveal a steep decline: repeated no-shows or late arrivals, incomplete work, cleaners ignoring briefings, and customers reporting missing items (ring, brush) with no real investigation. Staff attitude ranges from thoughtful to dismissive when time runs short or extra work is asked. The 3.5-star spread (58% five-star, 36% one-two-star) reflects this stark divide.
Gumucuci delivers consistently strong results on carpets, upholstery, and car seats with professional equipment and staff who respond quickly to inquiries. Reviewers praise the value for money, timely pickups and returns, and helpful advice on maintenance.
The reviews are sparse but unanimous: five-star ratings across all five Google reviews. Customers praise the quality of work and ease of dealing with the service. Review detail is limited.
Both five-star reviews credit Clean & Clear with on-time arrival and solid work quality. Evidence is limited to two responses, so patterns are hard to draw.
Strong satisfaction with staff professionalism and work quality drives most feedback, especially for carpet and residential deep cleans. However, inconsistent execution on post-renovation jobs, incomplete repairs after damage, and disputes over cleaning scope have created doubt among some customers about whether the promise matches delivery.
Ali Baba Cleaning gets mixed results. Some reviewers found cleaners friendly and competent, but recent feedback flags inexperienced staff who need constant supervision, work slowly, and lack professional finishing standards even after hours on site. Management's response to issues has upset clients.
Both Google reviews award five stars, though detailed feedback is not available. The business operates from Seri Edaran and serves the Klang Valley across residential, commercial, and specialist cleaning services.
All 11 reviews are five-star. Clients consistently praise the team for thorough work, punctuality, and professionalism across homes and offices. Staff follow up after jobs, handle hard-to-reach areas without prompting, and leave spaces noticeably refreshed.
Most customers report pleasant experiences with polite staff and clean results at reasonable cost. One older complaint mentioned slow work and incomplete cleaning despite a six-hour booking at RM450; the bulk of reviews praise attention to detail and willingness to return.
One reviewer praised the service as quick and efficient, with skilled staff. Review volume is minimal, so broad confidence is limited.
Half of reviews praise detailed, thorough work; the other half report rushed cleaners who miss corners, complain during the job, and damage items. Quality appears inconsistent.
Three five-star reviews praise the staff for professionalism, friendliness, and thorough work. Evidence is limited but consistently positive.
One review on file from two years ago rates the work favourably, but evidence is too thin to speak to specific strengths or watch-outs.
SAA Pro delivers reliable results for office and industrial cleaning, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Recent post-renovation work fell short, with incomplete interior cleaning and poor communication via WhatsApp, suggesting inconsistency in execution across service types.
When cleaners arrive, they work thoroughly and treat customers well. But recent reviews show repeated no-shows, missed appointments with poor communication, and staff not responding to messages for hours. The gap between their best and worst days is stark.
Only one five-star review is available. The reviewer noted good service, but detail is limited. The business operates across Klang Valley and offers carpet, residential, and commercial cleaning.
Most bookings result in on-time, thorough work from polite cleaners who often exceed expectations. Three one-star reviews cite monitoring issues, scheduling problems, and customer service gaps that undercut the strong majority experience.
Older positive reviews praise staff like Win and Winn for quick, sparkling results, but a one-star note flags a dead phone number, raising questions about current operation.
All four reviews are one or two stars. Customers report the business fails to show up, arrives hours late, cleans poorly (toilets remain dirty, floors sticky), and responds to complaints with excuses rather than solutions. One customer spent three weeks trying to get a response after service and missing items.
Review evidence is limited to a 4-star average across 4 Google reviews with a sharp split: 75% five-star, 25% one/two-star. The business operates commercially from Pandan Perdana and lists services spanning residential, office, carpet, and post-renovation cleaning, though detailed feedback on specific services is not available.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Five straight five-star reviews over two years show customers return repeatedly for carpet and sofa cleaning. Work is described as detailed and reliable, with a team that handles multiple services from car interiors to post-renovation cleanup.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Most jobs finish to time and staff know what they're doing, but one reviewer found major gaps after paying upfront: TV cabinet, shelves, yard untouched, only 2.5 of 4 paid hours worked. Others praise office cleans at TTDI and post-reno work; communication generally solid when it happens.
Both reviews report serious issues with TNT Cleaners' service delivery and staff conduct. Reviewers describe poor planning, rude behavior, and work quality they found unacceptable, with no mention of any redeeming aspects.
HK Professional Cleaning holds a perfect 5.0 rating from Google reviews. Details on specific service quality are limited, but the business claims 14 years of operation across Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, and Melaka.
One five-star review reports excellent service and intent to return, though review volume is minimal.
Both reviewers gave five stars. One bought rat repellent spray and was satisfied; another praised their chemical treatment as sophisticated and distinctive. Evidence is limited to two brief accounts.
One older review flags poor customer service and rudeness. Evidence is thin: just one negative rating from five years ago against a 4.0 average. Current sentiment remains unclear.
Golden Victory Resources holds a 3.0 rating from 2 reviews, reflecting mixed customer experiences. Review detail is limited, but the business operates in Shah Alam and lists general cleaning, spring cleaning, and terminal cleaning services on their website.
MaxWhite earned five-star ratings across all five Google reviews, with clients consistently praising efficient, thorough work and a team that listens to specific requirements before starting the job. All reviews are six years old, so current service levels are not confirmed by recent feedback.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is thin. One cited review criticizes sales conduct, while the rating split (60% five-star, 40% one/two-star) suggests mixed experiences. The business operates across diverse services and carries more reviews than most competitors in this category, but concrete service details from customers remain sparse.
Most five-star reviews praise the crew's friendliness and willingness to show up in bad weather, but a string of one-star complaints describe last-minute cancellations, multiple postponements, and staff who arrived late or didn't show up. The quality gap is stark: five-star reviewers report a "decent job" and thoroughness; low-raters found surface-level cleaning only, missed areas like sofa undersides and window exteriors, and part-timers who lacked training. Pricing disputes and refusal to rebook or compensate add friction.
Most jobs earn five-star praise for punctual, thorough work and friendly staff. Two low ratings flag lateness and unresponsive booking communication, suggesting execution outpaces customer contact.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
All five-star reviews praise quick, attentive work and deep cleaning that leaves customers satisfied. Limited review volume makes broader patterns hard to confirm.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Fabric cleaning (mattresses, sofas, carpets) earns solid marks from satisfied repeat customers in the Klang Valley; staff are described as friendly and reliable. Newer clients report disappointment when promises made during sales visits-full-house cleaning with multiple staff in one hour-do not materialize on service day, leaving customers feeling the price does not justify what they receive.
Last updated 2026-09-20
