
SUPERMAMA CLEANING PJ
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Page 3 of 5: businesses ranked 201-300 of 418. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Most reviewers praise the staff as friendly and polite, with several satisfied with cleaning results. However, two one-star reviews report communication problems and poor work quality, and the business shows sharply divided feedback across its history.

Strong satisfaction with staff professionalism and work quality drives most feedback, especially for carpet and residential deep cleans. However, inconsistent execution on post-renovation jobs, incomplete repairs after damage, and disputes over cleaning scope have created doubt among some customers about whether the promise matches delivery.

Both reviewers commend the friendly demeanor and responsiveness of staff, alongside affordable rates and solid cleaning results. Limited review volume means the picture is early-stage.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
When cleaners arrive, they work thoroughly and treat customers well. But recent reviews show repeated no-shows, missed appointments with poor communication, and staff not responding to messages for hours. The gap between their best and worst days is stark.

Most customers report efficient, friendly service at reasonable rates. One early review flagged an incomplete job on a tight schedule, but the overwhelming majority describe satisfied, repeat-worthy experiences across residential homes.

Across 20 reviews, Puchong Cleaning Service Diamond Sai delivers steady, punctual work with responsive staff. Most reviewers report consistent results for residential and daily cleaning needs, with few reservations noted in the feedback.

All reviews across two years rate this service at five stars. Customers consistently note fast turnaround, friendly staff, and thorough work at reasonable prices. The business has earned repeat bookings and strong word-of-mouth in residential and office contexts.

Five straight five-star reviews over two years show customers return repeatedly for carpet and sofa cleaning. Work is described as detailed and reliable, with a team that handles multiple services from car interiors to post-renovation cleanup.

Two recent one-star reviews cite dirt left on floors and missed spots, contrasting sharply with older praise for speed and focus. Consistency concerns emerge: a post-reno job was treated as standard cleaning, with obvious areas like windows and doors left unfinished.

All eight reviews give five stars. Reviewers praise the owner, Mr Foyez, as exceptionally helpful and approachable. Detail on specific services is limited from the review texts available.

All five reviews are five-star ratings praising fast booking and efficient work. One reviewer booked late at night and was served the next day; another praised staff member Alfred for his responsiveness and cleaner Maria for her work quality. Pricing consistently described as reasonable and good value.

Four recent reviews offer limited texture. Two rate the service highly without detail; one calls it remarkable. One office client complains the cleaner undoes tied trash bags to hand-collect waste rather than removing full bins, a practice that disrupts their workflow.

Fabric cleaning (mattresses, sofas, carpets) earns solid marks from satisfied repeat customers in the Klang Valley; staff are described as friendly and reliable. Newer clients report disappointment when promises made during sales visits-full-house cleaning with multiple staff in one hour-do not materialize on service day, leaving customers feeling the price does not justify what they receive.

Long-term clients praise reliability and flexibility, with staff like Andrew earning loyalty. Recent experience reveals serious issues: undisclosed per-cleaner charges, cancellations without warning, and booking requests that go ignored despite online visibility.

Most reviews praise clean results and professional work, but one long-term customer reports being reassigned to a different cleaner without warning after taking a one-month break. The complaint centres on poor communication rather than cleaning quality.

Past customers recall excellent results from sofa and mattress cleaning, with technicians Kuan, Denny, and Sean earning specific praise for professionalism and patience. Recent reviews tell a different story: booking has become a frustration, with ignored messages and delayed responses even for package subscribers, while last-minute cancellations plague AC service clients.

All five-star reviews praise quick, attentive work and deep cleaning that leaves customers satisfied. Limited review volume makes broader patterns hard to confirm.

All three reviews praise the agency for honest staff placement and consistent quality. One customer retained their assigned maid for four years, citing trust and reliability as the core reason for staying.

Most jobs earn five-star praise for punctual, thorough work and friendly staff. Two low ratings flag lateness and unresponsive booking communication, suggesting execution outpaces customer contact.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Experience here hinges on which team shows up. Long-term clients praise speed and consistency, but recent reviews paint a sharply different picture: missed appointments without notice, rushed jobs leaving dust and dirt behind, staff using same cloth across surfaces, and a customer service team that ignores follow-up requests for receipts and hangs up on callers. One five-star client used them for two years; another stopped after one visit when a gold chain went missing and no investigation followed.

Half of reviews praise detailed, thorough work; the other half report rushed cleaners who miss corners, complain during the job, and damage items. Quality appears inconsistent.

Both reviewers reported smooth, polite service with staff who followed instructions and showed dedication. Pricing mentioned informally at RM 200 per job.

Both reviewers praised the work quality and professionalism, with one highlighting the personal touch in customer care. Evidence is limited to two reviews from six years ago.
Three five-star reviews praise the staff for professionalism, friendliness, and thorough work. Evidence is limited but consistently positive.

Four reviews yield mixed results: some praise straightforward service and staff friendliness, but one recent complaint flagged disrespect. Limited data makes patterns hard to confirm.

Early reviews praised the work quality, but recent complaints centre on poor phone contact. Limited recent evidence makes the current state uncertain.

One reviewer praised fast work and good results. Another left a one-star rating with no comment, giving limited insight into the service.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Quality hinges on who shows up. Early clients and long-term users praise polite, efficient cleaners who finish thoroughly. Later reviews reveal a steep decline: repeated no-shows or late arrivals, incomplete work, cleaners ignoring briefings, and customers reporting missing items (ring, brush) with no real investigation. Staff attitude ranges from thoughtful to dismissive when time runs short or extra work is asked. The 3.5-star spread (58% five-star, 36% one-two-star) reflects this stark divide.

Ali Baba Cleaning gets mixed results. Some reviewers found cleaners friendly and competent, but recent feedback flags inexperienced staff who need constant supervision, work slowly, and lack professional finishing standards even after hours on site. Management's response to issues has upset clients.

Angel Helper's app-based booking draws praise for speed and ease. Reviewers highlight punctual, thorough cleaners who speak Malay, and pricing well under RM100 for three-hour sessions. Limited review sample, but consistent across both accounts.

Both reviewers highlight on-time arrival and thorough work. One notes the team finished within the agreed timeframe. No complaints are evident, though feedback is limited.

All four reviews are one or two stars. Customers report the business fails to show up, arrives hours late, cleans poorly (toilets remain dirty, floors sticky), and responds to complaints with excuses rather than solutions. One customer spent three weeks trying to get a response after service and missing items.

Five-star reviews praise Asyraf's team for attentive post-renovation cleaning, punctuality when on track, and reasonable pricing. One-star reviews document repeated no-shows, late arrivals without notice, rushed work, and corners cut in detail. Evidence is sparse and dated; recent activity unclear.

Most customers praise Tomy, Ina, and Nina for arriving on time and working with care and friendliness. One booking fell apart when the business failed to confirm service area before payment, then went silent on messaging.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

All three reviews praise Uni Clean Enterprise for fast, clean work at fair prices. Staff arrive on time with a helpful attitude, and the team handles both standard moves and add-on services like mattress cleaning without extra fuss.

Most five-star reviews praise the crew's friendliness and willingness to show up in bad weather, but a string of one-star complaints describe last-minute cancellations, multiple postponements, and staff who arrived late or didn't show up. The quality gap is stark: five-star reviewers report a "decent job" and thoroughness; low-raters found surface-level cleaning only, missed areas like sofa undersides and window exteriors, and part-timers who lacked training. Pricing disputes and refusal to rebook or compensate add friction.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Only one five-star review is available. The reviewer noted good service, but detail is limited. The business operates across Klang Valley and offers carpet, residential, and commercial cleaning.

Limited review evidence available. The business holds a 4.0 average on a single Google review and operates across residential and commercial sectors in Sungai Besi and surrounding Kuala Lumpur areas.

Only one Google review available, rated five stars. No review text provided to assess specific strengths or service details.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

One long-term client stayed three years with their helper; another endured two years before leaving due to staff changes, poor training, rude management, and drivers who arrived late. The business shows both loyalty potential and service inconsistency.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

One reviewer called the service the best recommendation, but another reported a full day on-site at a major facility with no worker payment settled and unsatisfactory work. Evidence is thin and drawn from only three reviews.

Older positive reviews praise staff like Win and Winn for quick, sparkling results, but a one-star note flags a dead phone number, raising questions about current operation.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

One five-star review praised the cleaner's responsibility and arrangement. A one-star complaint flagged poor scheduling, missed timing promises, and the need for constant follow-up. With only two reviews, evidence is limited.

Half of reviewers report satisfaction with job quality and staff names like Puteri, Yuna, and Kak Lina. The other half describe incomplete cleaning (ceiling fans, window grills, toilet edges left dirty), staff who ignore instructions, arrive 90 minutes late, or spend time on personal activities mid-shift. Evidence is limited but reflects a stark split in execution.

Most reviews (78%) are five-star praise for thorough car interior and carpet cleaning, with one customer noting Ali's team cleans hard-to-reach areas. Recent contact attempts went unanswered, raising questions about current responsiveness despite strong historical work.

Two customers praised SNS for politeness and cleaning quality, with one highlighting flexibility for last-minute bookings. However, one reviewer reported repeated failure to respond to WhatsApp and phone calls, raising concerns about reliability and legitimacy.

Most clients report on-time, polished work and responsive managers, but serious dissatisfaction centers on untrained replacements causing property damage and poor dispute resolution. Review evidence is limited to six accounts.

HK Professional Cleaning holds a perfect 5.0 rating from Google reviews. Details on specific service quality are limited, but the business claims 14 years of operation across Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, and Melaka.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Six in ten reviewers report serious delays, no-shows, or poor work quality. The five-star reviews (from 2–6 years ago) praise efficiency and pricing, but recent complaints centre on staff arriving 1–3 hours late, incomplete cleaning (dust under beds, untouched kitchen areas), and poor communication when handling reschedules or cancellations.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

One older review flags poor customer service and rudeness. Evidence is thin: just one negative rating from five years ago against a 4.0 average. Current sentiment remains unclear.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

MaxWhite earned five-star ratings across all five Google reviews, with clients consistently praising efficient, thorough work and a team that listens to specific requirements before starting the job. All reviews are six years old, so current service levels are not confirmed by recent feedback.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

MyBagSpa has a 2-star average across 11 reviews, with 73 percent one or two-star ratings. Customers report damaged leather, poor stitching, and unfinished work after months of waiting. The business charges premium prices (RM450 to RM500 per service) yet denies responsibility when problems surface.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

KakakM shows a sharp divide: some customers praise detailed, attentive work on full-day cleans; others report jobs left incomplete despite high costs. Limited review evidence makes consistency hard to predict.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

A scheduled appointment was cancelled at the last minute, with the customer waiting 2-3 hours for a reply before being told staff could not arrive on time. The rescheduled slot (afternoon instead of morning) wasted the customer's time.

Five-star reviews from two years ago praised thorough work and fair pricing, but recent one-star reviews report a stark collapse in service quality and serious breaches of trust. Multiple complaints cite staff theft (some documented on CCTV), management refusal to take responsibility, scheduling disruptions, and poor responsiveness once customers signed longer contracts. The gap between initial trial quality and contracted service troubles customers most. Early clients report staff communicated well and brought their own vacuum and ladder. Newer complaints focus on broken commitments and dismissive handling of serious allegations. The 2.2 rating reflects deep customer dissatisfaction in the past year.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One recent reviewer lost belongings during cleaning and received no response when they contacted the company. An older five-star review praised the work, but the overall pattern is thin and weighted toward concern.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Most customers report no-shows, last-minute cancellations, or significant delays without warning. A few older reviews mention punctual service and friendly staff, but recent feedback shows inconsistent reliability, slow work, and management that does not respond to complaints or issues like damage to belongings.
Last updated 2026-09-20